Germany is a federal state and education falls within the jurisdiction of its 16 states (‘Länder’). There is therefore no federal ministry in charge of education. Instead, each of the 16 states have their own.
At the federal level, the Basic Law (1949), Germany’s federal constitution, sets out equality before the law as a fundamental right. However, it does not name SOGIGESC grounds and only explicitly prohibits discrimination on grounds of “sex” (which according to the Federal Constitutional Court includes GIGESC) includes GIGESC). The General Act on Equal Treatment (2006), governing employment and access to goods and services, including private education, prohibits discrimination on grounds of ‘sexual orientation’ and considers trans and intersex people to be covered under “sex”. The Act is not applicable to public education.
The Social Code, Book VIII – Child and Youth Services (2021, para. 9) governing children and youth welfare obliges the state to take into account the situation of “girls, boys, transgender, nonbinary and intersex young persons” and underlines self-determination and participation of young persons. The public education institutions covered by this law code are schools (para. 13a) and early childhood education institutions, such as day-care centers (paras. 22-26). NGOs and civil society highlight the importance of the introduction of the terms “transgender”, “intersex” and “non-binary” as new juridical terms in German law code for trans, intersex and non-binary youth.
Mandated by the General Act on Equal Treatment, the Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency (2007) carries out a number of roles to prevent and combat discrimination (on the grounds included in the Act). These roles include submitting reports to the parliament, providing counseling to victims, and designing practical measures for prevention, amongst others. The new hate crime law, adopted in 2020, fails to include anti-LGBTQI crimes.
At the state level, six of the 16 constitutions prohibit discrimination on grounds of “sexual identity” (five) or “sexual orientation” (one). Additionally, each state has its own legislation in place when it comes to education. These vary in their scope. Seven states explicitly mention “sex”, “sexual identity” or “gender identity” in their respective school laws (Berlin, Brandenburg, Bremen, Rhineland-Palatinate, Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt and Thuringia).
At the federal level, there is no nationwide action plan in place, despite repeated civil society demands over the past years. This is despite the fact that the federal government committed in its coalition agreement, which was presented on 24 November 2021, to set up a nationwide action plan “for acceptance and protection of sexual and gender diversity”. The federal government also appointed a federal representative on queer issues on 5 January 2022.
Since the appointment of the federal representative, a number of different recommendations on LGBTQI issues have been put forward, alongside the creation of working groups aimed at developing strategies to promote better acceptance of sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics. These measures however, remain to be implemented, and there has not so far been any funding going towards the implementation of this plan.
In July 2023, the federal representative and the Berlin Senate appointed a new Commissioner of the Berlin State Government for the acceptance of sexual and gender diversity (Queer Commissioner). While not appointed directly by the LGBTQI community, this representative is tasked with advocating for LGBTQI communities and their concerns in Berlin during the 2023-2026 legislative period. The representative’s tasks will include the development, management and implementation of projects from the government’s policy guidelines as well as special measures and projects of political relevance.
The federal programme “Live Democracy” (2015) and its measures aim at combating prejudice, discrimination, and violence based on gender, sexual orientation, and gender identity. The programme supports projects with a focus on LGBTQI people. As of 2021, nine such projects are receiving funding, including Bundesverband Queere Bildung (Federal Association for LGBTIQ Education), whose members provide training in schools across the whole country.
At the state level, 15 out of the 16 federal states have adopted their own action plan or anti-bullying strategy. These vary in their scope, the measures included, and the funding allocated. The state of Berlin put in place the first ever action plan in Germany in 2009, which focuses on the education sector and allocates targeted funding to it. In 2019, Berlin was also the first state to put in place a competence centre in charge of LGBTQI education (Fachstelle Queere Bildung) and appointed QUEERFORMAT to lead this work.
The German Action Plan against Racism contains multiple measures to combat homophobia and transphobia. The Action Plan addresses homophobia and transphobia within the context of preventing and combating other forms of group-focused enmity. It offers a cross-sectional perspective that takes the diversity of LGBTIQ identities into account and also pays attention to multiple discrimination. Furthermore, the German Ministry for Family Affairs funds a competence network against homophobia and transphobia. The network unites several NGOs working on LGBTIQ related issues.
School curricula fall under the mandate of federal states. Some states have made SOGIGESC topic mandatory in their education plans, from which curricula are derived. Some States, such as North Rhine-Westphalia, refer to sexual identity or sexual orientation in their state guidelines for sex education. The state of Berlin in Germany focused on concepts such as difference, tolerance and acceptance to introduce sexual diversity in the primary curriculum. The Baden-Württemberg authorities have developed an education plan that includes a brochure and flyer that argues for social diversity and a recognition of all sexual orientations.
NGO QUEERFORMAT took part in the process of revising two school curricula in the state of Berlin: political science and history. QUEERFORMAT provided feedback on how these two curricula can be structured in a more intersectional way, including with regards to race, SOGIGESC, disability and class. These curricula have yet to be published.
There are a number of education materials available, provided by civil society.
Human rights education materials have few LGBTQI-specific modules.
There is no mandatory teacher training in place on LGBTQI awareness. Some states have organised training on the topic, in cooperation with civil society. QUEERFORMAT for instance holds regular training sessions and has reached thousands of teachers and social workers since 2010, commissioned by the state of Berlin, while Teach out is commissioned to train Berlin teachers in their legal traineeship. In Brandenburg for instance, Bildung unterm Regenbogen (Eng: Training under the Rainbow) offers training. North Rhine-Westphalia organises regular teacher training in cooperation with the NGO network Schule der Vielfalt.
NGOs have made hundreds of resources available on sexual and gender diversity for teachers and staff.
Berlin’s LGBTQI Action Plan was updated in 2023 to outline 340 initiatives that the state of Berlin's aims to implement. These include initiatives that explicitly state that diversity trainings should be put in place for teachers from kindergarten to high school level. These trainings should help better equip teachers to discuss gender and sexual diversity in the school environment.
NGO QUEERFORMAT is one of the primary organisations in Berlin that offer trainings for educators on LGBTQI issues. Additionally, QUEERFORMAT coordinates the local chapter of "Schule der Vielfalt" ("School for Diversity"), advising and working with five Berlin schools in their efforts toward diversifying their institutions on a structural level. The program identifies ways in which member schools can incorporate more LGBTQI topics into their curriculum and also aims to help make schools more diverse with regards to SOGIGESC more broadly, including in schools’ mission statements, projects, workshops, comprehensive sexuality education, etc. Every year, QUEERFORMAT hosts a workshop with the goal of connecting the respective schools and providing a space in which each of the five schools can share highlights, challenges, as well as best practices methods they have developed for school inclusivity over the previous year.
The government is generally supportive and civil society organisations have continued to receive substantial funding to provide support to LGBTQI youth. Nonetheless, hate crimes against LGBTQI people are a serious issue.
Conversion therapy performed on LGBTQ minors was banned in 2020, but only as long as they are “harmful” for the child’s well-being. This exception clause was harshly criticised by civil society, as well as the fact that young people over 18 are not protected.
In 2023, an anti-gender activist launched a petition to end “the gender language”, against the use of gender-neutral language in schools and on official forms in Hamburg, calling it “coercion”. The CDU distanced itself from the activist after she made anti-LGBTQI statements, but continues to support the petition, along with the far-right AfD. The campaign has appeared in other regions too.
In 2023, Humboldt University allowed trans, inter and non-binary students who have not gone through legal gender recognition or name change yet to use their chosen names on university ID cards, following a class action lawsuit filed in 2022. The HU took this step before the court decision.
In 2023, the far-right AfD in Lower Saxony announced their plans to restrict sex education in schools, allegedly to tackle “child abuse”.
The use of gender-inclusive language in educational settings remains an extremely controversial topic in Germany. While in Berlin there is currently no ban on the use of gender-inclusive language in educational environments, such a ban is expected to be introduced for the 2025-2026 school year. While the details and implications of such a measure are yet to be made public, the ban would mean that school students would no longer be allowed to use gender-inclusive language in schools, including the asterisk or the colon, currently used to make gendered words gender-inclusive in the German language. Currently, seven states in Germany have already issued statements banning the use of gender-inclusive language in educational settings: Bavaria, Saxony, Hesse, Saxony-Anhalt, Schleswig-Holstein, Thuringia and Bremen.
The use of gender-inclusive language in schools is thus a highly contentious topic and has been depicted by right-wing parties in Germany as a breach of the right to free expression. NGOs including QUEERFORMAT have been advocating for the safeguarding of the use of gender-inclusive language in educational environments. Through its advocacy work, QUEERFORMAT has highlighted that inclusive language serves as a tool for educators to represent and support LGBTQI young people and create space for young people who may be questioning their identity. The use of gender-inclusive language is also a way to make schools more open and diverse spaces. Many teachers in Berlin are currently questioning what such a ban in the state of Berlin would imply for educators, including whether it would mean that teachers or school staff would also no longer be able to use gender-inclusive language or could even be punished for doing so. QUEERFORMAT is working to support educators and their right to represent gender diversity, stressing that under Germany’s Basic Law, no one can be discriminated against on the basis of gender.
The provision of gender-neutral bathrooms in schools is also a current point of contention in Germany. In 2024, the Berlin Senate issued new rules stating that all Berlin schools have to provide unisex bathroom options. Implementation of this rule has however remained variable, due to a lack of guidelines for schools on how to put in place this measure, as well as wide disparities in the amount of funding that schools receive and can make available for such projects.
In 2025, Winter Pride marches (CSD) were held in Germany for the first time on February 15th. 10,000 demonstrators across the country attended these marches to show their support for LGBTQI people and their rights in the face of the rise of the far-right movement in Germany. Many CSD demonstrations notably took place in Eastern Germany, which has also been witnessing a rise of the far-right.
As of the date of this report, a number of queer educational initiatives are on the verge of closing their doors in light of an executive decision issued by the current Senator for Education, Youth, and Families in February 2025 stipulating major cuts to existing projects and organisations. These budget cuts significantly impact the work of organisations like QUEERFORMAT, resulting in a noticeable decrease in the number of workshops, consultations, and educational materials for educators. Several organisations have or will be forced to close operations altogether, including:
Previously, the seriously flawed, and partly unconstitutional Transgender Act (TSG) governed gender recognition regulations in Germany, The TSG required a psychiatric diagnosis (two expert opinions) and involved a court procedure. Non-binary gender markers were available to intersex people and to trans people if they have undergone the respective process as set out in the TSG. LGR and name change are available to minors without age limitation, but not on the basis of self-determination. The federal government committed in its coalition agreement of 24 November 2021 to replace the TSG with a new federal act on self-determination, including an administrative procedure for LGR and an enhanced prohibition of disclosure.
In November 2024, the TSG was replaced by the law governing self-determination in terms of the gender marker (SPGG). According to this new law, German citizens may change their gender marker and first name through simple declaration, instead of a judicial ruling. The simple declaration needs to be sent to the appropriate registry office (Standesamt) in Germany. The declaration can be reversed no earlier than one year after the declaration was made.
Minors under the age of fourteen, however, can only change their name and/or gender marker at the request of their legal guardian, while minors over the age of fourteen require permission from their legal guardian to change their name and/or gender marker.
While the legislation is a step forward compared to the TSG, civil society organisations have highlighted some key points of critique, including the lack of self-determination without parental approval for minors, and the fact that the law excludes people who do not have German citizenship.
There are no state policies in place regulating the recognition of the name or gender identity of trans students, and practices may vary. A 2013 legal opinion paper, which argues that using the correct name of trans students on school records prior to LGR is not falsification of documents, has been broadly used by NGOs in their advocacy work. NGOs Trans Kinder Netz, SCHLAU NRW, and others, including Germany’s Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency (FADA), use the paper as reference in their education materials for schools and legal assessment.
In 2020, the Federal Conference of Gender Equality Officers in Higher Education (BuKoF) issued guidelines for universities on how to respect gender diversity, including in terms of recognising students’ names and gender identity, adjusting online databases, putting in place gender-neutral bathrooms, and others. The guidelines list good practices across German universities. The updated guidelines from January 2022 added three new modules building on the initial recommendations
In 2023, a brochure for parents of trans children was classified as harmful for its anti-LGBT content.
The federal government collects data, and the individual states must record incidents of discrimination.
Civil society has also gathered data, see for instance the annual Maneo report in Berlin or LSVD’s compilation.
FADA provides a nationwide support service for those who experienced discrimination. It can also support victims in finding a local counseling service.
Support services are also provided on state and local levels. When discrimination or other hostile incidents happen in school however, there are no independent complaint mechanisms that students can use.
In Berlin, all schools need to report bullying to the local school authority. Schools also have to appoint someone to support LGBTQI learners and assist teachers on SOGIGESC issues. NGOs, such as LGBTQI youth organisation Jugendnetzwerk Lambda Berlin-Brandenburg, Schwulenberatung (Queer Leben), and Trans-Kinder-Netz all offer counseling for LGBTQI youth and learners for free. In Brandenburg, NGOs also offer anonymous and free counseling for LGBTQI learners, parents and teachers who experienced discrimination.
Some schools provide direct support to victims of bullying, but practice is not consistent across the country.
Several universities around Germany have Queer Referate associations, which play an important role in community organisation and empowerment of LGBTQI students in the university context. The Queer Referate also assists universities address cases of anti-LGBTQI hate speech, hate crime and discrimination in the university context. These associations are usually funded by student bodies like AStA. Several other organisations and institutions, for example the Federal Conference of Gender Equality Officers in Higher Education, focus on LGBTQI inclusion and equality in higher education institutions.
Civil society has produced a number of information materials on SOGIGESC issues for teachers, or for LGBTQI learners, often with state support. For instance, QUEERFORMAT has made materials available for early childhood educators, schools, and the youth welfare sector.
The federal government’s Rainbow Website (Regenbogen Portal) also offers information for teachers. The Rainbow Website is, however, not currently staffed, as the website services were stopped in November 2024 due to funding cuts. The Rainbow Website was a very reliable source of information and guidelines for educators and those working with queer young people. The loss of access to this resource will impact educators’ ability to support LGBTQI young people in schools.
QUEERFORMAT has published several posters and materials that can be used by schools to show their support for LGBTQI young people. These posters are also available on their website. QUEERFORMAT is currently working on more materials for educators to use in their institutions.
FADA has published resources on anti-discrimination for teachers in early childhood education, schools, and universities, including on SOGIGESC issues. In 2019, the federal agency also published guidelines for Recognising and tackling discrimination in school. However, the resource does not include a lot of information about anti-LGBTQI discrimination.
Germany has ratified eight of the nine core UN treaties, including the ICESCR and the CRC, which enshrines the right to education. Germany is a member of the European Governmental LGBTI Focal Points Network (as of November 2020) and has signed the 2016 UNESCO Call for Action. Germany received six recommendations on SOGIGESC issues in its 3rd Universal Periodic Review (2018), which called on the state to better address discrimination and facilitate legal gender recognition for non-binary trans or intersex people.
Here is the country's score for each ground of discrimination on which we based our observations for 8 of the 10 indicators presented above.
To enable a meaningful comparison of country progress over time, we have retroactively aligned the scoring systems used in the 2018 and 2022 Editions of IGLYO’s LGBTQI Inclusive Education Index with the updated 2025 scoring criteria. While each edition of the research has built on the previous one, reflecting evolving standards and priorities in inclusive education, minor changes to indicators and scoring weights were introduced in 2022 and 2025 to improve clarity, consistency, and comprehensiveness.
By recalculating the earlier scores according to the 2025 framework, we have tried to ensure comparability across all three editions and provide a more accurate picture of progress, stagnation, or regression in each country’s approach to LGBTQI-inclusive education. For this reason, you might find some scores in the PDF Report & Index 2018 and 2022 differing from those on the Education website for these two years.