There have been no legislative changes in Ukraine since 2022 that relate to education and SOGIGESC issues.
The Law on Principles of Prevention and Combating Discrimination (2013) does not mention SOGIGESC grounds. The Law on Education (2017) and the Law on Higher Education (2014, amended in 2022) prohibit discrimination in education, but do not mention SOGIGESC either. In 2018, Ukraine put an anti-bullying law in place, but without mentioning SOGIGESC.
ECRI’s 2020 monitoring report found that Ukraine has failed to criminalise anti-LGBTQI hate speech, despite ECRI’s recommendations in 2017.
The Law on Media prohibits in media and on video sharing platforms statements that incite hatred, enmity, cruelty, discrimination or harassment against persons based on, inter alia, SOGI.
Propaganda law bills have been repeatedly tabled over the past few years, but did not have enough support in parliament.
In 2021, Ukraine renewed its National Human Rights Strategy for the period of 2021-2023. The Strategy did not mention SOGIGESC, but included chapters on freedom of assembly, education, non-discrimination, and awareness raising, which can be used by activists. The new Human Rights Action Plan (2021-2023) mentioned SOGI under the term ‘intolerance’. These strategies have so far not been renewed,
A previous Strategy and Action Plan were in place for the period of 2015-2020, and their elements on SOGI issues remained largely without implementation.
SOGIGESC issues are not part of national curricula. Ukraine continues to have no mandatory sex education or human rights curricula in place.
A sociological survey by the Cedos Analytical Center and Info Sapiens Research Agency in 2020 found that both Ukrainian parents and teachers recognise the importance of comprehensive sexuality education but face challenges in its implementation.
Ukrainian teacher education programs do not include training on working with LGBTQI students or fostering inclusive school environments. This responsibility has largely fallen on NGOs that conduct training sessions for teachers, psychologists, and school administrators. Since 2016, only a few hundred educators have completed these programs, a small number given the scale of the problem in Ukraine. Without systemic changes in education and policy, LGBTQI students will continue to face discrimination and unsafe learning conditions.
The social climate for LGBTQI youth is generally not favourable, as LGBTQI issues are seen as controversial within education settings. The repeated attempts to introduce an anti-propaganda law have sparked public debates in mainstream media that often employed hateful narratives.
Discrimination and violence against LGBTQI people remains common in Ukraine and politicians routinely speak about LGBTQI people in a hateful manner. In 2018, the UN Independent Expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity carried out a country visit to Ukraine and found a lack of implementation of protective laws, stigma, discrimination, and a lack of positive political leadership on SOGIGESC issues.
A 2021 survey found that 80% of LGBT students feel unsafe in school and 87% feel excluded. In the month preceding the survey, 40% of LGBT students missed school because they feared for their safety. 70% of LGBT students heard anti-LGBT remarks made against them and two-thirds of them were also targeted by teachers. 55% said they had not a single adult in school they could turn to for support.
A series of online studies conducted in Ukraine between 2017 and 2023 by organisations such as "Fulcrum UA" NGO and the parental initiative "TERGO" revealed persistent challenges faced by LGBTQI+ teenagers in schools. The latest survey of 2023, which included nearly 900 respondents in Ukraine and those displaced abroad, showed that almost 80% of LGBTQI students do not feel safe at school due to their sexual orientation, gender identity, or appearance. About 30% reported experiencing physical or verbal violence, while over 70% encountered homophobic and transphobic remarks, not only from peers but also from teachers and school administrators. Additionally, 46% of respondents reported feeling unsafe in their own homes, highlighting the lack of support from family members.
More than 60% of LGBTQI teens stated they had no trusted adult to confide in about bullying at school, and over 50% chose not to report incidents due to fear of inaction or past negative experiences, many were advised to "not provoke the bully" or to "ignore it." The hostile environment in schools has significant mental health consequences as demonstrated by the fact that LGBTQI students are more likely to skip classes, suffer from low self-esteem, increased anxiety, and are at a higher risk of depression and suicidal thoughts than their heterosexual and cisgender peers. The study also found that students with at least one supportive adult at school reported better psychological well-being and a stronger sense of belonging.
In 2024 Nash Svit reported two cases of discrimination on SOGIGESC grounds in education. One case involved the lowering of grades and prejudice against a student by teachers. The other case involved a teacher being forced to resign and facing interference with their private life and disclosure of confidential information by the director of the educational institution.
Ukrainian schools can provide or host extracurricular activities or youth clubs on their own initiative.
The government does not provide funding, nor does it actively work in partnership with NGOs in relation to LGBTQI inclusive education.
Ukraine has legal gender recognition procedures in place, but they are not based on self-determination and remain inaccessible to minors. LGR is conditional upon a mandatory diagnosis and hormonal therapy and is a long bureaucratic procedure.
In Ukraine, the implementation of ICD-11 that removed the diagnosis of "Gender Dysphoria" or "Gender Incongruence" was set to begin in 2022, officially taking effect in January 2022. However, in practice, the system has yet to function as intended, and the implementation has slowed down due to the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine. The implementation of the ICD-11 does not require mandatory updates to clinical protocols to align with its diagnostic codes, as these are two separate processes. However, local activists advocate for the development of a new clinical protocol, even though it is not explicitly mandated in official documents.
The change of first name is possible from the age of 16. Since 2020, patronymic names can also be changed, on the basis of self-declaration.
Higher education institutions are obliged to issue a duplicate diploma following a person’s name change due to LGR. Not all institutions are aware of this regulation, but it is in place. Practice in secondary schools however is not regulated, and it remains up to the discretion of each school whether they allow trans students to use their correct name and gender in schools.
The government does not collect data on anti-LGBTQI bullying. Several LGBTQI organisations, including Nash Svit, Insight, and others, monitor human rights violations, but do not receive public funding to do this work.
A series of online studies conducted in Ukraine between 2017 and 2023 by organisations such as "Fulcrum UA" NGO and the parental initiative "TERGO" revealed persistent challenges faced by LGBTQI+ teenagers in schools (see under School environment)
In 2024 Nash Svit reported two cases of discrimination on SOGIGESC grounds in education. One case involved the lowering of grades and prejudice against a student by teachers. The other case involved a teacher being forced to resign and facing interference with their private life and disclosure of confidential information by the director of the educational institution.
Schools provide direct support and relief services for victims of bullying, but do not provide any training for counselors on SOGIGESC issues.
Civil society organisations provide support services for LGBTQI people and their families, but do not receive state funding to carry out this work. Such projects may include counseling, mental health aid, support groups, shelters and safe spaces, education on human rights and activism, humanitarian aid, educational training on human rights and non-discrimination, etc. For instance, Insight provides counseling and support groups for LGBTQI people.
In 2024, the LGBTIQ+ Communities Technical Working Group was established under the Protection Cluster umbrella. It works to collectively address gaps in service provision, promote collaboration among stakeholders, and advocate for policy changes that safeguard the rights and well-being of LGBTIQ communities. Focusing on inclusive humanitarian action, the working group aims to contribute to a more equitable and effective humanitarian response in Ukraine.
Fulcrum UA NGO uses approaches to provide support for younger audiences, including two interactive Telegram channels. The first channel, “It’snotOK” is a chatbot for youth that addresses and explains discrimination in cases and examples using gamification instruments. The informational campaign of the chatbot has reached out to 400,000 people and attracted 10,050 active users. As this tool has proven to be effective for the target group of teenage and young-adult audience, in 2025 Fulcrum UA NGO launched “Strengthen”, another chatbot with rapid estimation of general well-being, information, advice, and exercises to work with major mental health issues such as anxiety, apathy, sleeping problems, negative thoughts, loneliness, etc.
There are no laws prohibiting school employees from providing LGBTQI-related information to students. There is no evidence of laws or policies prohibiting the presence of LGBTQI-related information in schools. However, civil society organisations report that these are considered highly controversial, and would be removed immediately.
Ukraine has ratified eight of the nine core UN treaties, including the ICESCR and the CRC, which enshrine the right to education. Ukraine is not a member of the European Governmental LGBTI Focal Points Network (as of November 2020), and has not signed the 2016 UNESCO Call for Action.
Here is the country's score for each ground of discrimination on which we based our observations for 8 of the 10 indicators presented above.
To enable a meaningful comparison of country progress over time, we have retroactively aligned the scoring systems used in the 2018 and 2022 Editions of IGLYO’s LGBTQI Inclusive Education Index with the updated 2025 scoring criteria. While each edition of the research has built on the previous one, reflecting evolving standards and priorities in inclusive education, minor changes to indicators and scoring weights were introduced in 2022 and 2025 to improve clarity, consistency, and comprehensiveness.
By recalculating the earlier scores according to the 2025 framework, we have tried to ensure comparability across all three editions and provide a more accurate picture of progress, stagnation, or regression in each country’s approach to LGBTQI-inclusive education. For this reason, you might find some scores in the PDF Report & Index 2018 and 2022 differing from those on the Education website for these two years.